The steps involved in drafting, issuing, and managing an RFI to collect basic information from vendors.
The RFI (Request for Information) process is a crucial step in procurement that enables organizations to gather valuable insights about potential vendors, products, and services. For buyers, an RFI helps clarify the options available in the market, while for vendors, it offers an opportunity to showcase their capabilities and establish a strong first impression. This guide outlines the RFI process from start to finish, including best practices for both buyers and vendors.
An RFI, or Request for Information, is an initial document used in procurement to collect information from vendors before making purchasing decisions. It helps buyers understand which vendors are best suited for their needs without committing to a specific purchase or partnership. By submitting an RFI, organizations can narrow down their list of potential vendors, clarify their project requirements, and set the stage for subsequent procurement stages, such as issuing an RFP (Request for Proposal) or RFQ (Request for Quotation).
Before creating an RFI, the buyer’s team must identify the key objectives and needs driving the project. This involves outlining broad requirements rather than specific solutions, as an RFI seeks general information from vendors. Identifying these goals upfront will help guide the RFI’s content and the evaluation criteria used later.
Once the project’s goals are defined, the buyer drafts the RFI document. This document should be structured to gather high-level information about the vendors, focusing on areas such as:
To streamline responses, the RFI should include a set of focused questions or sections to help vendors provide relevant information efficiently.
With the document prepared, the buyer then sends the RFI to selected vendors. These may include current vendors as well as new ones identified through research or referrals. An RFI can be issued via email, a procurement portal, or specialized software, depending on the organization’s preference.
After receiving responses, the buyer’s team reviews and evaluates the information provided. The goal is to assess which vendors align best with the project needs and to eliminate those that do not meet the basic criteria. This step often involves comparing vendor capabilities, past project examples, and solutions offered in the RFI responses.
Following the evaluation, the buyer selects a shortlist of vendors for further consideration. This stage may lead to the issuance of an RFP or RFQ, where more detailed proposals, including pricing, are requested. The RFI helps refine the list of potential vendors and ensures that only those most likely to meet the requirements move forward in the process.
Before responding to an RFI, vendors should thoroughly review the document to understand the buyer’s objectives and priorities. Knowing the buyer’s industry, pain points, and project scope can help vendors tailor their responses effectively.
An RFI is an opportunity for vendors to stand out by showcasing unique capabilities and industry expertise. Vendors should focus on differentiating factors, such as specialized technology, proven project success, and experience with similar clients.
Since RFIs typically cover high-level information, vendors should avoid overly technical or detailed responses. Clear and concise answers help buyers quickly identify key information and assess compatibility. Providing structured responses with bullet points or brief summaries can be beneficial.
Including case studies or brief examples of successful projects related to the buyer’s needs can make a response more compelling. These examples provide evidence of the vendor’s capabilities and demonstrate practical experience in meeting similar requirements.
The RFI process benefits both buyers and vendors by establishing a foundational understanding that can lead to more efficient decision-making. For buyers, RFIs offer a structured way to explore potential solutions and evaluate market offerings without a significant time or financial commitment. For vendors, RFIs provide a chance to position themselves as knowledgeable, capable partners early in the procurement process, setting the stage for future collaboration.
In procurement, RFIs lay the groundwork for well-informed purchasing decisions, providing a cost-effective way to assess vendors and their offerings before moving to more formalized stages like RFPs or RFQs. For vendors, understanding the RFI process and delivering strategic responses can increase their chances of advancing to the next stage and ultimately securing new business.
Switching to Arphie usually takes less than a week — and your team won't lose any of your hard work from curating and maintaining your content library on your previous platform. The Arphie team will provide white-glove onboarding throughout the process of migration.
Arphie takes security extremely seriously. Arphie is SOC 2 Type 2 compliant, and employs a transparent and robust data protection program. Arphie also conducts third party penetration testing annually, which simulates a real-world cyberattack to ensure our systems and your data remain secure. All data is encrypted in transit and at rest. For enterprise customers, we also support single sign-on (SSO) through SAML 2.0. Within the platform, customers can also define different user roles with different permissions (e.g., read-only, or read-and-write). For more information, visit our Security page.
Customers switching from legacy RFP software typically see speed and workflow improvements of 60% or more, while customers with no prior RFP software typically see improvements of 80% or more.
Arphie enables customers achieve these efficiency gains by developing patent-pending, advanced AI agents to ensure that answers are as high-quality and transparent as possible. This means that Arphie's customers are getting best-in-class answer quality that can continually learn their preferences and writing style, while only drawing from company-approved information sources. Arphie's AI is also applied to content management streamlining as well, minimizing the time spent on manual Q&A updating and cleaning.
